January 2020 lecture.
‘Brunel’s SS Great Eastern’ Notes from the lecture by Dr Simon Hancock to the Pembrokeshire Historical Society in January 2020
The SS Great Eastern was one of the world’s most famous ships being the third of Isambard Kingdom Brunel’s steamships. His earlier ship designs, the Great Western(1837) and the Great Britain (1843) had been successful but both were dwarfed by the sheer scale of the Great Eastern which was originally known as the Leviathan. The ship was 692 feet in length and displaced 22,000 tons and was the biggest ship ever built and only surpassed in the twentieth century. Intended to sail directly to Australia with enough coal for the voyage the ship combined screw propellor, sails (there were six masts and five funnels) and paddle wheels. The ship could carry 4,000 passengers and had a crew of 418. The cost was originally estimated at £500,000 and the keel was laid down in 1854 at the Napier Yard at Milwall and the builder was John Scott Russell. The ship was launched sideways into the Thames but the whole project was bedevilled with financial difficulties. There were three months of inactivity due to funding difficulties. The ship was ready to launch in 1857 but the first attempt in November 1857 was a fiasco. It took nearly three months to launch the ship with numerous accidents and only after employing hydraulic Rams from the Tangye company. The ship was launched on 31 January 1858 and the whole launch coat around another £170,000. The ship was fitted out and the maiden voyage undertaken in 30 August 1859. On 6 September 1859 an explosion threw the no. 1 funnel into the air and caused considerable damage. Six crew members died in the accident.
Although designed to sail for the Far East the Great Eastern was put on the transatlantic route (1860-3) which it was never designed for. The first voyage to New York took place on 17 June 1860 and took around ten days. Several of the voyages made small profits but these were more than wiped out by accidents such as when the ship struck a rock while entering New York in 1862 which cost £70,000. The ship’s double hull was highly original and saved the vessel.
During winter periods the Great Eastern was laid up at Neyland on a huge gridiron on two occasions (1860-1; 1862) being repaired. By 1864 with mounting debts, the ship’s owners sold the ship for a mere £25,000. The ship was converted into a cable layer and she was employed in helping to lay the Atlantic cable including 2,600 miles of the 1865 cable. Between 1866-74 the Great Eastern laid 30,000 of cable including a stretch from Aden to Bombay in 1869-70. By 1874 even this work was done and with no purpose the ship was sent to Milford Haven in 1874 and was laid up there for 12 years. In 1886 the ship was sold and eventually became a floating advertising hoarding for the firm of Lewis of Liverpool. The Great Eastern was sold to Henry Bath and she was scrapped at New Ferry on the River Mersey (1889-90) and it took more than two years to break her up. Some of the ship’s keel still lie in the foreshore while the top mast stands at the Kp end at Anfield football ground.
The Great Eastern was a ship was ahead of its time. Financial mismanagement and truly desperate bad luck made the ship a white elephant and the stress of the whole project in no small part contributed to Brunel’s untimely death in September 1859.
Barnes Wallis in Wales: Romance, experiment and discovery
On 4th October 2019, Professor Richard Morris gave an enthralling talk on the great inventor Barnes Wallis. An overview of his career and personal life was followed by a description of his time in Wales and, specifically, Pembrokeshire.
Wallis was born in 1887. Despite his many innovative inventions, he was in many ways a Victorian at heart. He did not go to university but started work at 16 to help support his family after the early death of his father.
His early work included contributions to the design of the first airships built in Britain, including the R100 and ill-fated R101 built between the wars. He moved on to aircraft design. He was closely involved in the development of the Vickers Wellesley, the first aeroplane to fly non-stop from Britain to Australia. Wallis also conceived the geodetic fuselage structure used in the Wellington bomber. The Wellington was the only bomber to serve with the RAF through out the Second World War and more Wellingtons were produced than any other British bomber.
Wallis is best known for designing the “bouncing bombs” used by 617 Squadron to breach the German Moehne and Eder dams. In the 1955 film, The Dambusters, Wallis was played by Michael Redgrave. After the film’s huge success, Wallis apparently altered some of his behaviours to become more like his character in the film. His later war work included designing the first large “earthquake” bombs used to attack underground and/or heavily concreted bunkers. After the War, his mind continued to produce new ideas, the most revolutionary of which were never fully developed. One school of academic thought says he was too far ahead of his time; another says they simply would not have worked.
In 1922, Wallis met Molly Bloxom who was related by marriage to one of his aunts. Molly appears to have been the first woman to arouse Wallis’s interest. She was just 17 and he was 34. Her father refused to allow Wallis to court his daughter because of the age difference. Wallis was, however, allowed to teach Molly algebra by post. They exchanged some 250 letters. On Molly’s 20th birthday Wallis proposed and was accepted. They married in 1925. Their relationship was a long and happy one and they had four children. They corresponded by letter whenever they were apart and Professor Morris used readings from their letters to great effect.
The second strand to the talk was Wallis in Wales. He holidayed regularly at Borth, including for his honeymoon. Some of the early experiments in the development of the “bouncing bomb” were done at a disused reservoir in Wales. It was used to establish how much explosive would be need to breach a dam. These tests showed that much less explosive was required if a bomb could be detonated right against the base of the dam and this led to the “bouncing bomb” concept. Molly Wallis was a witness to some of the testing and wrote a wonderfully indiscrete letter to a friend describing her trip and hinting at the success of the testing.
Wallis developed a smaller variant of his “bouncing bomb”. It was originally conceived as a means of attacking German battleships. The spin imparted to the bomb before its release meant that on hitting a battleship it would run down the hull to the ship’s underside before exploding in the battleship’s weakest spot. Britain’s war planners thought that this bomb, code named Highball, might be used to block the railway tunnels in the Alps cutting off the main supply routes from Germany to her ally Italy. The key question was whether the Highball could be dropped with sufficient accuracy to enter a railway tunnel. The tests were carried out in Pembrokeshire using the Maenclochog tunnel on the Rosebush railway line. Great Western laid on a special train to take Wallis and his team to Wales from London to supervise the tests. The luxurious train carriages and railway attendants were described in detail by Wallis in a letter to his wife. The tests were a success, but the Highball was never used. Wallis put in an expense claim for £4 to cover the cost of celebratory for his team on the return rail journey!
Professor Morris finished his talk with a short film clip taken of a Mosquito bomber and its test bombing runs at the Maenclochog tunnel.
4 October 2019 Prof. Richard Morris ‘Barnes Wallis in Wales: Romance, experiment and discovery.’
1 November 2019 Mari James ‘Suffragettes in Pembrokeshire.’
6 December 2019 Dr Julie Coggins ‘Science and the Farmer: Agricultural Development in Pembrokeshire
3 January 2020 Dr Simon Hancock ‘Brunel’s SS Great Eastern.’
7 February 2020 Sir David Lewis ‘The Cawdor’s of Stackpole.’
6 March 2020 Mary John, MA ‘Words about Wiston.’
3 April 2020 Ken Murphy ‘The First Iron Age Chariot in Wales: Excavations at Llanstadwell in 2019.’
On 1 March the speaker was the chair of the Pembrokeshire Historical Society, Dr Simon Hancock FSA who spoke on The Pembroke Mint. This was a change to the advertised talk.
Simon Hancock set the scene with a review of the Norman incursions into south west Wales after the death of Rhys ap Tewdwr in 1093 and the founding of Pembroke Castle by Arnulf de Montgomery. In 1102 the Lordship of Pembroke was taken into Royal hands by Henry I (1100-35) and this, coupled with the encouragement of Flemish migration saw considerable economic advances for the Borough of Pembroke.
In 1130 the sheriff of Pembroke named Hait, perhaps a Fleming, listed a return of some £60 into the Exchequer. There was only one denomination at the time so all would have been paid in silver pennies, over 14,000 worth. Around that time a mint was opened at Pembroke with a moneyer named Gillopatric, perhaps an Irishman. He struck some of the later issues of Henry I . The mint signature is rendered as PAIN or PAN. All Pembroke issues are exceedingly rare. From the Pipe Roll there is reference to Gillepatric paying the sum of £2 although he still owed a further £2. Nothing more is known of this enigmatic moneyer. He also struck for King Stephen and very recently a unique Pembroke penny struck for Matilda was unearthed. This reflects the changing political fortunes of The Anarchy which followed the death of Henry I.
Later a second Pembroke moneyer, Walthier or Walter is known. His were part of the so-called ‘Tealby’ coinage. It is thought the Pembroke mint closed in the very early 1160s never to reopen. These wafer thin pieces of silver are a very tangible link with the young borough of Pembroke of the twelfth century. As recent events over the past two years demonstrate our knowledge is far from complete. The discovery of new and occasionally hitherto unrecorded specimens means we will always need to revise our understanding of the chronology of events.
Pembrokeshire’s First World War: local memories and family mementos
After a brief introduction by Simon Hancock, four members of the Society each made a presentation on the Great War experiences of their relatives. The presentations covered pre-war life and their ultimate fate.
JAMES HAMILTON LANGDON YORKE
Anne Eastham spoke about her grandfather, James Hamilton Langdon Yorke, known to his family as Tony. He was born in New Zealand but returned to Pembrokeshire on inheriting the Langton estate from an aunt. Tony joined the Pembroke Yeomanry prior to the war and embarked for service in Egypt in 1916. The Pembroke Yeomanry became part of the 24th Battalion, the Welsh Regiment in 1917. Captain Yorke took part in the fighting that led to the capture of Jerusalem from the Ottoman Turks. He was awarded the Military Cross for “conspicuous gallantry and devotion to duty. When part of the line was driven back by the enemy, he rapidly reorganised the situation with great skill under very heavy shell and machine gun fire. He showed splendid leadership and initiative”. He was killed in action on 27 December 1917 and is buried in Jerusalem War Cemetery. There is a memorial to him in Spittal church.
LIONEL THOMAS OF TREHALE
Harry Boggis-Rolfe talked about Lionel Thomas of Trehale. He enlisted as a cadet on the outbreak of war and was commissioned into the Welsh Regiment from the Artists’ Rifles in 1916. (The Artists’ Rifles was used as an officer training unit during both world wars.) He was posted to France in December 1916. He was killed in action on 20 September 1917 during the Third Battle of Ypres (or Passchendaele) while serving with the Machine Gun Corps. He was just 19 years old. He is buried in the Hooge Crater Cemetery in Belgium. After the war, his family paid for the restoration of St Teilo’s church, Llandeloy in his memory.
THE JOHNS BROTHERS OF MANOROWEN
Edward Perkins spoke about the Johns family of Manor Owen. Five of their sons served as officers during the war. Owen fought on the Western Front, winning the Military Cross in 1916. He was killed in action on 28 June 1916 while serving with 133rd Trench Mortar Battery, Royal Field Artillery during the preparations for the Battle of the Somme. His brother Herbert also won a MC while serving with the Royal Artillery. One of the four survivors, Mortimer Johns, was deeply affected by his experiences and lived a lonely outdoor existence in a hut after the war. Two of the daughters served as nurses and one met her future husband while serving.
Adrian James talked about his grandfather, Tom James. He was conscripted into the Royal Field Artillery and served as a Gunner on the Western Front during 1917-18. Tom James kept a diary during the war and Adrian illustrated his presentation with extracts from the diary and post cards sent home from Bulford Camp, where Tom trained, and from France. Tom was hospitalised twice, the second time after being wounded in action. Adrian noted that strangely there was no entry in the diary for 11 November 1918, the day the war ended. He recovered from his wounds and went on to serve as part of the British Army of Occupation in Germany after the Armistice. He was demobbed in 1919 and return to Pembroke Dock. He died in 1953.
The Society hopes to publish some of this material in a future copy of the Journal.
The Romans in Pembrokeshire – the text of a talk given by Dr Mark Merrony to the Society on 2 February 2018
THE ROMANS IN PEMBROKESHIRE
Good evening, I am delighted to have been invited to give this talk by the Pembrokeshire Historical Society. It has been many moons since I last did so: if I recall this was on a winter’s night in Saint David’s some fifteen years ago.
The subject of my talk then was the discovery of what was claimed to be a Roman villa at Ford near Wolfscastle by Richard Fenton in 1811, a site that I subsequently investigated in 2003. I also broadened that presentation to encompass other discoveries in Roman Pembrokeshire up to that time.
Since 2003 I have been a bit distracted by work commitments in London and overseas, but have still retained a keen interest in the Roman history of this region and in light of the fact that discoveries continue to be made, I felt that the time was ripe to revisit to take a look once more at the broader picture as it now stands.
To put these more recent discoveries into their rightful place, I think it is necessary to turn the clock back to the first suggested evidence for the Romans in Pembrokeshire and present something of a chronological overview.
This will encompass the discovery of Roman villas, military and civilian sites, and Roman roads through Pembrokeshire. I should stress at this early stage that the work of Dyfed Archaeological Trust and The Royal Commission on Ancient and Historical Monuments has been instrumental in our increasing understanding of this situation. Also, the work of Martin Davies in recent years has tackled the investigation of Roman roads in Pembrokeshire and Ceredigion head on and I will return to Martin’s work later.
Perhaps the most appropriate place to begin in our grand tour of Roman Pembrokeshire is in the Roman period itself. The first evidence comes from Book Two of Ptolemy’s Geography, produced in the second century AD. This mentions Saint David’s Head by the name Octapitarum Promontorium Slide 1. This is thought perhaps to refer to the Bishops and Clerks islets west of Ramsey Island. The map also mentions Moridunum (Carmarthen), along with the Demetae, the Celtic tribe who inhabited this region in the Iron Age, who evidence suggests were thoroughly Romanised, Moridunum being their political centre before and during the Roman period.
Moridunum is also mentioned in an itinerary known as The Peutinger Table, thought to be a thirteenth century copy of a Roman original of the third century AD. Acquired by the German antiquarian Konrad Peutinger in 1508 and now in the Hofbibliothek in Vienna. Slide 2.
Other ancient references to place-names in the county come from a forged fourteenth century document, History and Itinerary, written by Richard of Cirencester. Slides 3-4. 1809 translation. This includes an itinerary of Roman Britain, listing a road known as the Via Julia west of Moridunum (Carmarthen) to Ad Menapiam (St David’s), via Ad Vigesimum (a supposed Roman station located in north Pembrokeshire. The authenticity of this document was widely accepted when it was first published in 1757 by Charles Bertram, but proved a forgery by Bernard Woodward, Librarian in Ordinary to Queen Victoria in 1847. Richard of Cirencester was actually a fourteenth century monk and historian at Westminster Abbey.
At Castle Flemish, the Antiquarian Richard Fenton found fragments of Roman brick here, as he describes in A Historical Tour Through Pembrokeshire. Slide 5. It was excavated by Mortimer Wheeler in 1921, he discovered sherds of Roman pottery, hexagonal roofing slates, and flue-tile. The site is now identified as an enclosed Roman villa. Slides 6-9.
Another account of a Roman villa at Ford near Wolfscastle was published by Fenton in the same book. This is an oft-cited quote but the essence of it is the discovery of a bath, roofing tiles with iron nails, various bricks, some grooved, and others etched with lines.
It seems that Fenton was not an entirely trusted source and the idea of the Romans in Pembrokeshire was largely put on the backburner after the address of the Bishop of Saint David’s to the British Archaeological Association during the Tenby Congress in 1884. There he remarked that: ‘I do not know that there is any trustworthy evidence that the Romans ever got into Pembrokeshire at all.’
However, subsequent investigations at the site of Richard Fenton’s Roman villa at Ford continued to recover Roman material through the course of the twentieth century, such as roofing slates and a Roman oil lamp, which is presently in Carmarthenshire Museum.
It should also be stressed that Roman material has been recovered from a range of sites in the north and south of the county, notably from coastal promontory forts at Brawdy, Buckspool, and elsewhere, furnishing evidence of steady occupation through the Roman period. The same may be said of a series of so-called ‘ringforts’ near Llawhaden and elsewhere. Also, there have been numerous Roman coin hoards discovered in the county and the broader region.
After Fenton’s identification of the Ford Roman villa, the next site of its kind was not discovered until 1950. This is at Trelissey near Amroth in the south-east of the county, and it was excavated under the direction of W.G. Thomas and R.S. Walker in 1950 and 1951. Slides. 10-12 They found a formal Roman building with coarse and fine pottery, the head of a javelin, and other finds. It is generally agreed that the site is an enclosed Roman villa.
In 1995, a Roman road was excavated during the construction of the Whitland bypass just over the border in Carmarthenshire. Slides 13-14. This is a section of a road known from aerial photographs heading west from Carmarthen into Pembrokeshire, traced as far west as Wiston.
The next tangible Roman discovery, or should I say rediscovery, occurred on the site of the Ford Roman villa observed by Fenton. In early 2003, guided by an Ordnance Survey map, I visited the site and found several large roofing slates. Subsequently, I undertook a geophysical survey with Tony Johnson of Oxford Archaeotechnics and we found a rectilinear building on a SE-NW alignment under the intersection of three hedges. Slides 15-20. As expected, the ferrous material in this general location (fences, gates, water trough) had washed the signal out over this area, but it was still possible to identify the general form of a subterranean feature approximately 18.5 by 7.5m. The original excavation at Ford took place with the kind assistance of several local volunteers on the weekend of 29 and 30 March.
It was logical to excavate the area that corresponded to the clearer part of the geophysical plot, south-east of the water trough. This entailed the investigation of an area on a N-S alignment, carefully removing the overburden to reveal a series of large stone slabs. These were essentially the foundation stones of the building and there was no trace of any of the superstructure apart from an area of tumble, which did not appear to correspond with the alignment of the structure. Overall, the site appears to have been heavily robbed of stone, a process that was underway between the building’s discovery and Fenton’s visit.
Disappointingly, there was a distinct lack of pottery apart from a piece of Roman fabric that is a tile or brick. However, a grinding stone or quern was unearthed. This appears to be part of a saddle quern, which consists of a lower stone (saddle stone) on which corn was placed, and an upper stone (rider), which was pushed to-and-fro on top of this. Normally these were replaced in the Iron Age by the beehive rotary quern but in some areas, saddle querns remained in use into the Roman period.
Several more roofing slates were discovered. Without question, the most diagnostic find was a piece of flue tile, with a distinct combing pattern, reminiscent of Fenton’s description of similar material over two hundred years ago.
The tenant farmer of Bank Farm had kindly agreed to fence this area off to prevent cattle straying on to the excavated area, but he was unable to sink any stakes at a sufficient depth due to the presence of subterranean stones. Without doubt the base of the building continues on a south-east alignment and extends beyond the present farm track, so there is certainly scope for future excavation in this location.
In 2010, the site was surveyed and excavated by Dyfed Archaeological Trust with the assistance of local volunteers under the direction of Duncan Schlee but investigation was hampered by the presence of a farm track which now overlies much of the area originally investigated. Slide. 21. The geophysics echoed the results of our survey but with the exclusion of the villa building, but the coverage was more comprehensive, and revealed the presence of a previously unknown prehistoric enclosure as well as a possible Romano-British building to the north-east of this site.
Since this survey and excavation were undertaken, further Roman discoveries have been made. One of the most significant of these is a Roman fort at Wiston. This was found in 2012 through geophysical survey, followed by trial excavation (in 2013 and 2014) by James Meek of Dyfed Archaeological Trust. Slides 22-24.
Part of this has been visible for some years on Ordnance Survey maps but it had been previously dismissed as recent. Examination of the pottery suggests that the fort was occupied in the late first century/early second century AD and that it was reused in the mid-second to the mid-third century AD, perhaps as a civil site.
A significant breakthrough was made when geophysical surveys revealed the presence of an extensive civilian vicus settlement to the south. This was confirmed by excavation in 2014.
It is important to say a little about the identity of the people who would have inhabited civilian villas on the one hand; and military forts, on the other. Evidence elsewhere in Britain indicates that the owners of what we term Roman villas were not in fact Roman but were essentially elites who were local to individual regions and bought into the Roman brand. Forts on the other hand were garrisoned by Roman legionary troops and auxiliaries from across the Roman empire. The Wiston fort was probably built by legionariess and auxiliaries of the Second Augustan Legion whose headquarters were at Caerleon near Newport. Slides 25-26. It is known that units from the legion were involved in the construction of Hadrian’s Wall in the second quarter of the second century.
This extraordinary development is by no means the end of the story of new Roman discoveries in Pembrokeshire. In February 2017, I received an email out of the blue from a student named Luke Hooper at Bournemouth University. He asked my opinion of a geophysical plot of a survey that he had undertaken in the summer of 2016 in north Pembrokeshire, under the auspices of University College London. Conclusion: an enclosed villa with a square Romano-Celtic temple adjacent to it. Slides 27-28. A small excavation of this site was undertaken last summer and this confirmed that the site is a Roman villa.
One of the major contributions to the study of Roman Pembrokeshire in the county most recently has been presented by the work of Martin Davies. Martin has been investigating the elusive Roman road network in the county and also in Ceredigion as published in his new book, Ancient Causeways Uncovered. Slides 29-34. Of special interest is a route that appears to run north from near the Roman fort and vicus at Wiston, over the Preselis via Tafarn-y-Bwlch and into Ceredigion. Slides X-X. Llandewi Aberath. Road heading north. Part of his suggested route runs straight past the Roman villa and temple site just mentioned.
A Roman road that is of particular interest to Martin, myself, and others, is the route mentioned earlier, that runs from Carmarthen to Wiston. The intriguing question is: where is it heading? An obvious place is to the Cleddau here in Haverfordwest, however, to the best of my knowledge, there is no evidence of this as yet.
It is often thought that the road is heading to Saint David’s, and there are some clues given by particular place-names, but there is also some possible archaeological evidence. At Rudbaxton, a possible trace of a Roman road was observed by aerial photography on WSW-ENE bearing by Chris Musson of The Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Wales, in 2002. The next clue is a long stretch of road known as The Causeway which lies to the north of Camrose and tracks in a general north-westerly direction. Slides 35-37. This is not marked on the modern 1:25,000 Ordnance Survey map of north Pembrokeshire, but it appears on older OS Maps, as in the case of this map, published in 1951.
It is highly probable that this was the route taken by Gerald of Wales in the later twelfth century. Slide 38. In The Itinerary of Archbishop Baldwin Through Wales: ‘From Haverford we proceed on our journey to Menevia [Saint David’s]… and passed through Camros… We then passed over Niwegal sands…’ (Gerald of Wales, Book I, Chapter 13).
In A Historical Tour Through Pembrokeshire, Richard Fenton refers to a stretch of Roman road in Newgale itself that was exposed by a storm around 1780, as described by a Mr Jones of Lether, and in the winter of 1795. He described this as: ‘…two lines of pebbles parallel, and for a mile in length; the pebbles from one inch to a foot [in] diameter…’ He speculated that this was, ‘…by tradition, said to have extended from Old Menapia along the coast to Dale on Milford Haven, and known by the common appellation of the Old Welsh Way (1811, p. 80).’
Fenton considered that Brawdy, on the hill to the north, could derive from Broadway, but this idea is perhaps not plausible in light of the fact that it may in fact derive from the Welsh name Breudeth. In a manuscript of 1293, Breudeth had been shortened to Bre’udy according to Bertie George Charles (The Place Names of Pembrokeshire, 1992).
There is possible archaeological evidence for a Roman road a little to the south of Brawdy at Llethr, which was photographed by Toby Driver in 2003, and this may be a northern extension of the road described by Fenton.
Roman roads are marked on the older Ordnance Survey maps between Brawdy and Saint David’s but these appear to be influenced, perhaps in large measure, by the forged map of Charles Bertram. For instance, Menapia Roman Station is marked above Whitesands Bay. Slide 39. It is curious that this is also known as Porth Mawr – Great Port. Also, this was an important medieval crossing point to and from Ireland. I am grateful to Bishop Wyn Evans for clarifying this point.
Crucially, Pliny the Elder, Natural History, writing in the first century AD, mentions that: ‘Hibernia lies beyond Britannia, the shortest crossing being from the lands of the Silures, a distance of 30 miles’ (Book IV.16.103). (45.6 kilometres or 28.33 miles). The distance in fact is about 47 miles.
The importance of Whitesands Bay as a point of crossing to Ireland is underscored by the excavation in 2016 by Dyfed Archaeological Trust of around 50 skeletons at Saint Patrick’s Chapel, dating to the early medieval period (seventh to eleventh century). Slide 40.
There is no certain archaeological evidence for a Roman presence apart from an unconfirmed fort at Trepewet east of Saint David’s. However, I think there are reasonable grounds to assume that a road runs from Saint David’s east to Carmarthen.
Place-names and archaeological evidence play a role here. We pick up the chase again near Brawdy, with reference to ‘Broadway’. Slide 41. This photograph of a parchmark was taken by Toby Driver near another Broadway, located to the west of Llawhaden in 2003. This is the Carmarthen to Wiston Roman road mentioned before.
I think that it is significant that just a few kilometres to the east of Broadway, near Brawdy, is another Broadway, taken by Toby Driver in 2006. Slide 42. This lies not far to the southwest of the Ford villa near Wolfscastle. A large section of hedge/trackway runs in a general ENE direction for some distance. Slides 43-44. This takes a line to the south of the modern road alignment that is marked on the older Ordnance Survey maps as Roman.
The same may be true further to the east near the Roman villa site at Castle Flemish. On the OS map the road bisects the site and this is probably because it was thought of originally as a Roman station. Slides 45-47. It is in fact plausible to think that a Roman road runs further to the south, since there is a place-name a little to the southwest of the site called Stradland, which may be interpreted as ‘Streetland’, referring to the presence of a Roman road.
Generally speaking, from my experience in other parts of Britain, Roman villas tend to logically correspond to Roman roads. You don’t get one without another. Akeman Street. Slides 48-51.
There is every reason to suppose from place-names that the road continues east, crossing Martin’s north-south road through the county somewhere near LIys-Y-Fran bisecting it near Springhill House.
The next relevant place-name, Pensarn, is about seven kilometres to the ESE, on the western bank of the Eastern Cleddau River. Approximately three kilometres to the north-east appear the names Parcsarnau and Sarnau. It is often the case that some crucial names have been removed from the modern Ordnance Survey maps, such as Parcsarnau in this case. Slide 52.
The next place-name, Pen-sarn, comes east of Login. Slide 53. Then ESE of Llanboidy there is a veritable cluster of relevant place-names: Blaen-sarn-goch, Sarn-goch, Sarn-newydd, Caerlleon, Efail-Caerlleon, Penyrheol, Sarnau, Sarn-y-bwla. Slides 54-56. The route comes to an end west of Carmarthen where it may intersect the Roman road to Whitland and beyond.
I am not the first person to note this concentration of place-names. In fact Professor Barri Jones did so in 1971 and also identified an agger running on a general east-west alignment towards the confluence of the Afon Cywyn and the Nant Cynnen near Rickett’s Mill in the direction of St David’s Hospital. Slide 57. The most extraordinary thing is that the collective evidence, from archaeology and place-names, appears to confirm the existence of a roman road that more or less follows the fictitious Via Julia. Slide 58.
I should conclude by reflecting on future discoveries, and I am convinced that there are many more villas that await investigation, with perhaps fewer forts to be established along the emerging Roman road network. It is not difficult to envisage the presence of a Roman road linking the Cwmbrwyn villa near Llandorow, discovered in the early twentieth century, with the Trelissey site at Amroth. Slides 59-60. especially since there is every reason to suspect another site nearby at Eastlake Farm. In the meantime, the forthcoming excavation of the Roman villa discovered by University College London in north Pembrokeshire may even produce the long-awaited discovery of some Roman mosaics. Such is the unpredictability and excitement of archaeology.